Hi folks,
Today we are going to explore a topic that’s been buzzing around the financial world lately – taxing unrealized gains. You might have heard President Joe Biden’s announcement back in March about a plan to tax the unrealized gains of those with over $100 million in assets.
In simpler terms, this means that if you have assets like stocks that have increased in value, you’d have to pay tax on that increase, even if you haven’t sold the stocks.
Let’s break it down with a bit more detail and updated information as of 2024. This proposal, while unlikely to pass Congress, is still a significant topic of discussion because depending on future political shifts, it could become a reality.
First, what exactly are unrealized gains?
Imagine you bought a stock for $50, and now it’s worth $100. The $50 increase is your unrealized gain because you haven’t sold the stock yet. Currently, in the U.S., you only pay taxes when you sell the stock and actually realize the gain. But with this new proposal, you would be taxed on that $50 gain even if you haven’t sold the stock.
Why is this a big deal for investors?
Well, it completely changes the game. It’s like being taxed on your home’s increased value every year, even though you haven’t sold it – oh wait, we already do that through property taxes.
But unlike property taxes, where you have a tangible asset you can live in, taxing unrealized gains on stocks means you’re paying taxes on paper profits. These are profits that could disappear if the market takes a downturn.
One of the main arguments against this tax is its potential to hurt investment. If investors know they’ll be taxed on gains they haven’t even realized, they might be less inclined to invest in the first place. This could stifle economic growth and innovation, which are heavily driven by investment.
Moreover, implementing such a tax would be incredibly complex. Determining the value of certain assets, especially those that aren’t easily traded, could be a logistical nightmare.
For instance, how do you accurately value a privately held company’s shares annually?
This plan, although it aims to address wealth inequality by targeting the ultra-rich, could have unintended consequences that ripple through the economy. It could affect everyone from the top investors to the average person with a retirement account.
So, what are we going to explore in today’s blog?
We’ll dive deeper into the potential impacts of taxing unrealized gains, why it might be a bad idea, and what alternatives could better address the issues it aims to solve.
Stick around till the end to get a full picture of this hot topic and how it might affect you. Let’s get started.
A Spending Problem: My Perspective on the U.S. Debt Situation
When we look at the gross domestic product (GDP) of the United States, it stood at around $28.27 trillion in the first quarter of 2024. Yet, our total debt was about $34.83 trillion at that time, according to the U.S. Treasury’s Fiscal Data service. The U.S. Congressional Budget Office has recently estimated that our total debt could exceed $50 trillion by 2034.
We are already facing issues in funding future liabilities for Social Security and Medicare. This situation is aggravated by the expansion of government bureaucracy and the financial burdens of foreign wars.
Now, I’m not an economist, but a tax professional who believes that instead of taxing unrealized gains, the government should focus on reducing its spending. Our debt-to-GDP ratio was around 122% as of late June 2024. For perspective, it was around 57% in 2000 and about 34% in 1980, based on data from the U.S. Debt Clock.
Additionally, we are issuing more Treasury bill debt, and what’s more concerning is that we are doing this at the short end of the curve with high interest rates. Federal debt interest payments for 2024 are projected to be around $870 billion, which is more than the $822 billion allocated for defence spending.
This is troubling. Just like in personal finance, if you aren’t earning enough, you need to cut back on unnecessary expenses. Printing more money is not a sustainable solution and has already contributed to our inflation problems.
Moreover, foreign central banks are reducing their holdings of U.S. Treasuries. Perhaps these traditional bond buyers are seeing our rising debt-to-GDP ratio and are worried about the increasing risk of not getting their money back.
To be fair, global debt has increased in many countries, largely due to the pandemic. But this doesn’t change the fact that we need to address our spending habits to secure a more stable financial future.
Taxing Unrealized Gains: Why It Feels Unfair to Me
I’ve been thinking a lot about this new idea of taxing unrealized gains, and to be honest, it feels really unfair.
Here’s why:
When we talk about taxes, I get that if you make a profit by selling something, you should pay taxes on that profit. That makes sense. But what if you haven’t sold it yet? Taxing it then seems wrong.
Our tax code in the U.S. is already complicated, and while I’m all for simplifying it, taxing unrealized gains just doesn’t seem right.
Imagine you own something valuable, like stocks in a company, but you haven’t sold them yet. You haven’t actually made any money from them, but under this proposal, you’d still have to pay taxes as if you had.
That’s not fair.
If this rule goes through, will the government also give back money if those stocks lose value? Probably not.
Think about it from the perspective of a startup. Imagine you’re building the next big tech company in your garage. You’re paying your team in stock options because you don’t have much cash yet.
As your company grows and the value of those stocks increases, would you really want to force your team to sell their shares just to pay a tax on gains they haven’t even realized?
That would mean they’re creating another taxable event just to cover the first one. It feels like a never-ending cycle that could hurt new, promising companies.
This proposal could push talented people to take their ideas and businesses out of the U.S. It might make more sense for them to innovate somewhere with fairer tax rules.
Above all, taxing unrealized gains seems inherently unfair. You haven’t actually benefited from the value of your asset, but the government already wants a piece of it. That feels more like taking your money than a fair tax.
Some more insights and details
- Tax Code Complexity: The U.S. tax code is known for its complexity, often criticized for being difficult to understand and navigate. Efforts to simplify the tax code are ongoing, but introducing a tax on unrealized gains would add a new layer of complexity.
- Fairness Debate: Many argue that taxing unrealized gains is unfair because it taxes potential value, not actual income. Critics believe it could lead to financial strain for individuals and businesses who may have to sell assets to pay the tax.
- Impact on Startups: For startups, especially those in the tech industry, stock options are a common way to compensate employees. Taxing unrealized gains on these options could force startups to sell shares prematurely, potentially hindering growth and innovation.
- Global Competitiveness: The proposal could impact the U.S.’s competitiveness on the global stage. Entrepreneurs and businesses might look for countries with more favourable tax policies to base their operations on, leading to a potential brain drain.
- Historical Context: This isn’t the first time taxing unrealized gains has been proposed. Similar ideas have been discussed in the past, often meeting resistance due to concerns over fairness and practicality.
By considering these points, we can see why this proposal is controversial and why many, like me, feel it’s an unfair approach to taxation.
Wrapping Up
Taxing unrealized gains presents numerous challenges and concerns that cannot be overlooked. From the complexity of implementation to the potential stifling of investment and innovation, this proposal seems fraught with pitfalls. It risks unfairly burdening individuals and businesses with taxes on paper profits that may never materialize, creating financial strain and potentially driving economic activity and talent away from the U.S.
Rather than introducing such controversial measures, a more balanced approach focusing on prudent spending and sustainable fiscal policies could better address wealth inequality without compromising economic growth and stability.
Frequently Asked Questions
Ques. What are unrealized gains?
Ans. Unrealized gains are increases in the value of an asset that you haven’t sold yet. For example, if you buy a stock for $50 and it’s now worth $100, the $50 increase is an unrealized gain. These gains are only “on paper” and are not realized until the asset is sold.
Ques. How are unrealized gains currently taxed?
Ans. As of now, unrealized gains are not taxed. Taxes are only applied when the gains are realized, meaning when the asset is sold. This is in contrast to President Biden’s proposal which suggests taxing these gains annually, even if the assets haven’t been sold.
Ques. What is Biden’s proposal on taxing unrealized gains?
Ans. President Biden’s proposal, known as the Billionaire Minimum Income Tax, aims to impose a 20% tax on the unrealized gains of households with net wealth over $100 million. This means these households would owe taxes on increases in asset values each year, regardless of whether they have sold those assets.
Ques. What are the arguments against taxing unrealized gains?
Ans. Critics argue that taxing unrealized gains is unfair because it taxes potential value, not actual income. It could discourage investment, be difficult to implement, and might require investors to sell assets prematurely to pay the tax, potentially stifling economic growth and innovation.
Ques. How would taxing unrealized gains affect investors?
Ans. Taxing unrealized gains could lead to reduced investment in growth-oriented businesses, as investors might avoid volatile assets that could see large unrealized gains. This could slow down innovation and economic growth, especially for startups and small-cap companies.
Ques. Could taxing unrealized gains be implemented fairly?
Ans. Implementing such a tax fairly would be complex. Valuing non-tradable assets like privately held companies could be challenging, and there could be issues with liquidity if investors don’t have the cash to pay the tax on paper gains.
Ques. Has any other country implemented a tax on unrealized gains?
Ans. While some countries have experimented with wealth taxes that include unrealized gains, such measures are rare and often meet significant resistance. The U.S. would be breaking new ground with such a tax, making its implementation and enforcement particularly challenging.
Ques. What are the potential economic impacts of taxing unrealized gains?
Ans. The economic impacts could include reduced investment, slower economic growth, and a potential outflow of capital as investors seek more favourable tax environments. It could also lead to higher administrative costs for the IRS and more complex tax filings for individuals and businesses.
Ques. What is the current status of Biden’s proposal to tax unrealized gains?
Ans. As of now, Biden’s proposal has not been passed by Congress. It remains a topic of debate, with significant opposition and uncertainty about its future. The proposal is part of broader discussions about wealth taxes and tax reforms targeting the ultra-wealthy.
Ques. What are alternative ways to address wealth inequality without taxing unrealized gains?
Ans. Alternatives include increasing taxes on realized capital gains, raising income tax rates for high earners, closing tax loopholes, and improving enforcement of existing tax laws. These measures could target wealth without the complications of taxing unrealized gains.
Also Read –
How to Calculate Taxes on Your Social Security Benefits?
Can I convert my traditional IRA to a Roth IRA without penalty?
State Tax Changes 2024 from 1 July 2024 – Everything You Need To Know
2024 Tax Law Changes and Their Effects on Business Tax Planning